Back to the main page.

Bug 731 - read digital trigger on neuromag system

Status CLOSED FIXED
Reported 2011-06-06 12:27:00 +0200
Modified 2012-07-07 20:25:47 +0200
Product: FieldTrip
Component: fileio
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Operating System: Linux
Importance: P1 major
Assigned to: Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen
URL:
Tags:
Depends on:
Blocks:
See also:

Ralph Huonker - 2011-06-06 12:27:41 +0200

Created attachment 65 my patched version of the read_trigger function Dear all, we encountered a problem with reading the triggers coming from the neuromag (Vectorview 306) system. The (digital) trigger is a 16 bit (unsigned) trigger, but it is read as int16. That turns all values >=2^15 into negative values and, thus, it detects the rear slope (which is the positive slope) and takes the value after the jump as trigger value, which is not correct. The detection of the negative slope "ft_read_event(filename,'detectflank','down')" does not work either as it "remembers" the value before the jump, which is incorrect (in this case), too. I propose to fix the int16 vs. uint16 problem in the private function read_trigger, but for digital channels only. I found the following variables known to the read_trigger function useful: "dataformat" that seems to be either "neuromag_fif" or "neuromag_mne" and "fixneuromag" (that is set to 1 for analogue trigger channels) to avoid patching the analogue values of these trigger line. I propose to insert something like (e.g. before "if fixneuromag" (after line 123)): > % to fix the uint16 problem if value >= 2^15 % added RH > if strncmpi(dataformat,'neuromag',8) && ~fixneuromag % added RH > dattmp = typecast(int16(dat),'uint16'); % added RH > dat = double(dattmp); % added RH > end % added RH You might feel it would be better to introduce another variable to mark this case. This would preserve the convention. But this yields the necessity to change all functions that call the read_trigger function. Please "fix" the read_trigger function to correctly read the unsigned 16bit trigger values of the digital trigger channels. I append my changed function (from the fieldtrip-20110602 release). If you wish, I can send a test file. The test file contains 306 MEG-channels (empty room), STI009 .. STI016 (which are interpreted as analogue trigger channels and have values 0 for Low and 5 for High) and the channels STI101 (which is the digital (composite) trigger) and the channels STI201 and STI301. STI101 contains 7 different triggers (1024 16384 32512 32768 33792 49152 65280). The trigger occur every second, beginning from sample 4001. This sequence is repeated 5 times. If you have questions don't hesitate asking me. Best regards Ralph


Boris Reuderink - 2011-11-17 10:46:44 +0100

Changed the status of bugs without a specific owner to UNCONFIRMED. I'll try to replicate these bugs (potentially involving the submitter), and change confirmed bugs to NEW. Boris


Boris Reuderink - 2012-01-12 15:12:34 +0100

Seems like a clear bug report. Changed status to new (not much to confirm).


Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen - 2012-01-27 08:36:02 +0100

assigned bug to get all bugs lined up before the grand bug binge


Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen - 2012-03-21 15:36:59 +0100

Hi Ralph, Sorry to not have addressed this issue for so long; we would like to follow up on this. Could you please upload a small text file that we can use for testing? We then can incorporate your proposed patch into the release version of fieldtrip. Best, Jan-Mathijs


Ralph Huonker - 2012-03-22 10:18:07 +0100

Created attachment 239 testfile to confirm the bug (as requested) newly made testfile: The test file contains 306 MEG-channels (empty room), STI009 .. STI016 (which are interpreted as analogue trigger channels and have values 0 for Low and 5 for High) and the channels STI101 (which is the digital (composite) trigger) and the channels STI201 and STI301. STI101 contains 7 different triggers (1024 16384 32512 32768 33792 49152 65280). The trigger occur every second, beginning from sample 4360. This sequence is repeated 5 times.


Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen - 2012-03-25 20:28:15 +0200

Thanks, we'll look into it. JM


Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen - 2012-03-26 12:13:54 +0200

Hi guys (adding Alexandre to CC list of this bug), Ralph, thanks for the patch, it looks sensible, but ideally I'd like to solve this at the lowest level possible, i.e. the reading functions themselves (hence the inclusion of Alexandre). Apparently, in the example data provided by Ralph, the fiff_read_tag function treats the data as signed integer (because the function is told to do so by the data file, it seems). Is this a general issue, or just present on the machine that Ralph records data from?It seems to me that a patch can be constructed that will not cause problems when the input data was actually correct, probably in if statement like if any(dat)>2^16 % skip else % patch end but I would like to have Alex' opinion on this.


Alexandre Gramfort - 2012-03-26 14:44:09 +0200

indeed it really seems like a bug and it should be fixed at the lowest level. I'd be happy to fix the problem upstream [1] I suggest you send me a patch or send me a fif file with a test script that shows the problem so I can test locally. Alex [1] https://github.com/mne-tools/mne-matlab


Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen - 2012-03-26 14:45:06 +0200

Hi Alex, Great! for a patch and some test data, see the attachments to this bug. Cheers, JM


Alexandre Gramfort - 2012-03-27 09:11:00 +0200

I did a check yesterday and my conclusion is that it's more a problem when writting the fif file. How did you write it? why : when you do with MNE: mne_show_fiff --in ft_test2_raw.fif --tag 300 --verbose you get: ? 300 = data buffer 317000 ints 300 = data buffer 317000 ints 300 = data buffer 317000 ints 300 = data buffer 317000 ints 300 = data buffer 317000 ints ... so the data buffers are stored as integers according to the fif tag header. And the mne-matlab toolbox can read uint32 buffers : https://github.com/mne-tools/mne-matlab/blob/master/matlab/fiff_read_tag.m#L250 let me know what else I can do to help Alex


Ralph Huonker - 2012-03-27 10:00:01 +0200

(In reply to comment #10) Hello Alex, in our case, the fiff-file is written by the Neuromag system software itself, either by the data acquisition software (DANA rel. 3) or the maxfilter software provided by Elekta-Neuromag. There are no settings to change. Thus, it would be very helpful to have the read function handling this issue. Best regards Ralph


Alexandre Gramfort - 2012-03-27 10:43:12 +0200

if it's a file provided by neuromag then the bug should be reported to them and fixed on their side as if I modify the mne-matlab code I will break other things. I tend to think that the hot fix should be in fieldtrip only for now. Jan-Mathijs are you ok with this? Alex


Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen - 2012-03-27 12:11:12 +0200

Yes, I agree: I'll build it in.


Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen - 2012-04-05 09:59:17 +0200

Hi guys, Sorry for my slow action on this, I am about to commit the change to the code. Could you confirm for me that a digital trigger channel should never have a value < 0? In this case I could build in a check that if a <0 value is detected the data are typecasted. Cheers, JM


Ralph Huonker - 2012-04-05 10:36:44 +0200

(In reply to comment #14) Yes, you are right. We expect trigger values between 0 and 0xFFFF in the digital channel.


Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen - 2012-04-05 10:49:58 +0200

committed into fieldtrip release with svn revision 5596